Home About Public Policy Science Impacts Films Resources Alerts Contact Us

Impacts

SNAFU (San Francisco Neighborhood Antenna-Free Union) Petition to Protect the Public from Cellular Phone Antennas and Other Wireless Transmitters (95K PDF format). CLICK HERE to view, download or print the one page petition. Sign it and share it with those you know and love.


On This Page: Health & Safety, Children's Health, Churches and Other Places of Worship, Electrical Sensitivity, Environment, Landuse Planning, Public Safety, Reflections On What It All Means

"Wherever we go, we will be immersed in a sea of low-level pulsed microwave signals."

Ross Adey, M.D.

Eminent scientist with over 20 years of research experience on non-ionizing radiation Professor of biochemistry, University of California at Riverside, California

Introduction

"Electrosmog: At What Price Convenience?" was written by B. Blake Levitt and Theresa Morrow, the activist who inspired a public form in April '07 on environmental radiation issues and who died of breast cancer in May '07, shortly thereafter.

Citizens groups, like SNAFU in San Francisco are closely evaluating their local wireless siting ordinances. The impact of wireless facilities on communities is not only perceived as a health risk. It is also believed to affect property values and sense of neighborhood, whether they are stealth-like or not. In fact, many people would like to see them in plain view so they can be avoided. See Cell towers are dangerous, but we're not allowed to say.

Health & Safety

We all now live a wireless digital technological age. Chronic exposure to electromagnetic radiation from voluntary personal use, involuntary exposure to terrestrial antennas, towers,satellites and military applications are increasing on the planet. Consumer behavior, utility company practices and most government agencies largely ignore health concerns while electromagnetic field ?safe? exposure standards are being challenged by many scientists, engineers and citizens for not protecting health and safety.

The cell phone is the universal symbol of progress and its use is the spark igniting the drive towards globalization, a trend that promises many economic and social benefits.

Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland M.D., Director-General of the World Health Organization recently stated: ?sustainable development is the relationship between society and our planet?.

In the future, history will show how life forms are able to tolerate and adjust to the cumulative effect of combined manmade frequencies in addition to existing natural background radiation that life evolved in. Yet, electromagnetic radiation also causes health problems and distress in humans and animals. More people are reporting symptoms of electrical sensitivity or microwave sickness, such as sleeplessness, depression, fatigue, poor concentration, memory loss, burning sensations and rapid pulse. Are these reports just symptoms of stress brought on by modern day life? Or, are these ?canaries in the coal mine? sending us a warning?

Several excellent articles appear in the online Association of Comprehensive Neurotherapy online edition on electrical sensitivity, childhood development impairment, central nervous system impairment and recent public policy developments. (Click for article)

Dr. Martin Graham, professor emeritus at UC Berkeley in Computer and Electrical Engineering, defines electrical pollution as "A Ubiquitous Pollutant". According to Graham, "there are millions of transmitters in the electrical power system that are the equivalent of Marconi?s transmitter. The power distribution wires are the antennas and groundings that couple these noise-like signals to humans. The effects on humans depend on the path the currents produced by these fields take through the human body, on the sensitivity of the individual, and on the amplitude, waveform, and duration of the fields.? For more information, see: http://www.toxicelectricity.com/Pages/News1F.htm.

We believe the proliferation of transmitting antennas and increased demand for electrical power, brought on by the upsurge in consumer demand for digital electronic and wireless equipment in homes, schools and offices needs to be evaluated as an environmental health problem. We strongly urge a precautionary approach regarding chronic exposure to electromagnetic radiation to raise public awareness and to protect health so people can ?learn and earn?. We offer the definition of the precautionary principle developed by the Collaborative on Health and the Environment.

The Importance of a Precautionary Approach: The precautionary principle should become a guiding factor in public health and environmental policy. The precautionary principle indicates that, when there is plausible scientific evidence of significant harm from a proposed or ongoing activity, preventive or corrective action should be taken to reduce or eliminate that risk of harm, despite residual scientific uncertainty about cause and effect relationships. Implementing the precautionary principle requires assessment of how to accomplish desired goals, looking for the safest alternatives, democratic participation, and reversal of the burden of proof. That is, the proponent of an activity bears the burden of assessing its safety and of showing that it is both necessary and the least harmful alternative. Decisions affecting public and environmental health should be fully participatory. For details on CHE, go to http://www.cheforhealth.org/.

Here is a simple test to find out what your exposure level is: An inexpensive hand-held AM radio receiver will detect these signals. Tune the receiver to the lowest frequency on the dial (about 500 kilohertz), which is below the lowest frequency broadcast station, turn up the volume, and you will hear a noise. As the receiver comes closer to a transmitter, the noise becomes louder. Try it near dimmer switches at various settings, personal computer displays and keyboards, fax machines, microwave ovens, electronic telephones, high efficiency fluorescent lamp bulbs, digital clocks, electric coffee grinders, videotape recorders, or hand-held hair dryers. This provides a rough tool for determining where there are relatively high EMF exposures that you may want to protect yourself against by personal avoidance, installing shielding or elimination of the source entirely.

Children's Health

Our children's health and well-being are among our greatest concerns. In late 2000, the UK Department of Health announced plans to require warning labels on cell phones and recommended limited use of cell phones by children and not siting wireless facilities near schools. Walt Disney Corporation announced they were pulling licensure agreements which gave cell phone manufacturers the right to market cell phones sheathed in Disney characters (see: http://www.energyfields.org//impacts/disney.html). Yet, in spite of these major cautionary developments, the wireless industry continues to aggressively market these devices to children and schools (see: http://www.vote.com/magazine/editorials/editorial1653001.phtml) by encouraging schools to site wireless facilities on school buildings and playing fields and to purchase wireless computers for use in the classroom. Such proposals need to be closely examined by school boards and parents. (See: Wireless Devices, Standards, and Microwave Radiation in the Education Environment, http://www.emrnetwork.org/schools/brown_paper.htm).

Here are a few examples of what is going on:

"The thought of classrooms full of schoolchildren using AirPort-equipped iMacs or iBooks day in and day out, being exposed to radio frequency emissions at close range, makes me distinctly uneasy given the level of ignorance on this issue."

How Safe Is Wireless Computer Networking? by Charles Moore, MACpinion, 09 December 1999

"...human demand for wireless and other broadcast technologies is actually fatal to some species. Songbirds, who migrate at night and navigate by the stars and Earth?s magnetic field, flock to lights near their flight level, such as those atop communications towers, when overcast skies limit visibility. Collisions with the tower, its surrounding guy wires, or other birds crowding toward the same lit space often prove fatal. Ornithologist Bill Evans estimates that U.S. towers kill 3 to 5 million birds annually (in Northeastern U.S. alone)

Green Guide, Mothers and Others "The Cellular Tower Wars", May 1999, Alison Sloan, Associate Editor

Churches and Other Places of Worship

Churches are vulnerable to solicitations from commercial wireless carriers. Most churches need money for capital improvements and congregations are shrinking. In April 1999, a public forum on EMFs, called "Going Wireless" was held at Westminster Church in Tiburon, California, sponsored by the Council on Wireless Technology Impacts. This was one of the first forums in the U.S. for citizens, scientists and government officials to meet and discuss whether cellular phones and transmitting antennas posed a health risk to man and the environment. Westminster Church cancelled a contract with Sprint in 1997 after learning there were potential health risks. Their position, was and still is: "forgo the lease income and not allow the antenna to be placed on the steeple, "to be a good neighbor", just in case."

Here are some related news reports from that time:

Electrical Sensitivity

WHO Director-general reports she is electrically hypersensitive. "But I understand the scientists who warn. I think we have reason to be cautious, and not use the [mobile] phone more than necessary. And the younger you are, the more reason to take this seriously. I think you should follow the precautionary principle", Gro Harlem Brundtland, WHO Director-General says. March 9, 2002.. English translation: http://www.energyfields.org/impacts/brundtland.html.

How Safe Is Wireless Computer Networking?, by Charles Moore, Contributing Columnist, Road Warrior, 09 December 1999. http://www.energyfields.org/impacts/road_warrior.html.

Cleaner Air Signage Program in California -- In late 2001, California exercised strong initiative by adopting a new building standard that encourages voluntary compliance in providing disability access for persons with multiple chemical sensitivities or electrical sensitivity to and through public buildings or any facilities leased or rented by State of California. The purpose of the new standard is to allow safer paths of travel and cleaner air for persons with these disabling conditions so they may attend to their needs in publicly funded facilities. Concerned citizens and interested parties can help make this program work by encouraging voluntary adoption if this standard by managers of publicly funded buildings. For details, go to http://users.lmi.net/wilworks/events/clnerair.htm.

Environment

Sites on towers and effect on migratory birds

www.Towerkill.com

http://www.abcbirds.org/letter3.htm

Landuse Planning

Here is a rather long, but excellent research paper for serious students of facility site planning:

"Wireless Personal Communications Services (PCS) Antenna and Tower Sitings: "Strategic issues and options for industry and local government" by Mark Brose brose@freenet.msp.mn.us Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota

http://freenet.msp.mn.us/people/brose/papers/pcs.html#_Toc389511494

http://www.naco.org/counties/codes/cat_res.cfm?Category_Code=C41

Wireless tower locator http://www.berkana.com/tower.php3
 
Cash Comes Calling as Churches Rent Spacehttp://www.atheists.org/flash.line/church13.htm

Public Safety

Emerging information on the new public safety systems being installed around the world, their operating systems, the frequencies they employ for transmitters and handsets, which can be more powerful than cellular or 3G and, that transmit high frequency pulsed modulated digital signals and, the potential health effects. While CWTI supports improved public safety communications, we are concerned about the long term health effects on public safety personnel and the general public. More research is needed to justify the increased microwave pollution that these systems create.

Key Links:

Reflections On What It All Means

"Accept the evidence and minimize the (EMF/EMR) exposure by good design... One of the important things I promote is energy efficiency -- passive solar -- because that means you use the sunshine and the wind for your energy flows and you don't need electricity for most of it. So, you can drastically reduce your electrical requirements hence, your electric current and your power bill, and your health risks, by having good design, renewable energy. If you can use the energy that falls on your property, whether it's ventilation energy, solar energy, or rainfall energy, then you have a much more sustainable and cleaner environment, and sustainable society. We have been encouraged to move to technological control. I'm suggesting we ought to smart design, because that when I'm talking about, the Greeks knew 3,000 years ago. And forgetting that is costing us a great deal in our economy and also in our health."

- from talk by Neil Cherry, O.N.Z.M, PhD., San Francisco, March 2002.

Hear Tell: Invisibility, Invasiveness, and the Cell Phone by Chellis Glendinning. Published in Wild Matters, March 2002. http://www.energyfields.org/impacts/chellis.html.

No questions asked - or allowed by Jessica Doremus, R.N. http://www.energyfields.org/impacts/no_questions.html.



View our films online for free and/or order a DVD: "Public Exposure: DNA, Democracy and the Wireless Revolution" and, "Dr. Ted Litovitz's EMR Research Presentation to U.S. Congressional Staff".

Home | About | Films | Donation | Public Policy | Science
Impacts | Resources | Alerts | Contact Us | Search | Site Map